Test Data of etching SiO2 with CHF3/CF4: Difference between revisions

From UCSB Nanofab Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Comment on 7/22 check.)
(save a data point)
Line 72: Line 72:
|Investigating reports of low etch rate
|Investigating reports of low etch rate
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/c/c3/I2210308.pdf]
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/c/c3/I2210308.pdf]
|-
|8/9/21
|I22105
|140
|0.97
|After etching diamond sample for 1 hour using Cl2/Ar
|
|}
|}

Revision as of 02:19, 10 August 2021

ICP#2: 0.5Pa, 50/900W, CHF3/CF4=10/30 sccm, time=210 sec
Date Sample# Etch Rate (nm/min) Etch Selectivity (SiO2/PR) Averaged Sidewall Angle (o) SEM Images
10/5/2018 SiO2#02 160 1.2 82.1 [1]
1/28/2019 I21901 146 1.23 [2]
3/6/2019 I21904 151 1.23 85.6 [3]
7/18/2019 I21905 162 1.37 [4]
1/16/2020 I22001 149 1.21 [5]
8/9/2020 I22002 102 0.86 caused by air leaking to CHF3 channel [6]
1/7/2021 I22101 144 1.20 [7]
5/19/2021 I22102 163 1.11 Etch time=130 sec [8]
7/21/2021 I22103 134 1.09 Investigating reports of low etch rate [9]
8/9/21 I22105 140 0.97 After etching diamond sample for 1 hour using Cl2/Ar